Relationship development and maintenance

relationship development and maintenance

Jun 6, The development and maintenance of interpersonal relationships through computer‐mediated communication. Copying or distributing in print or electronic forms without written permission of IGI Global is prohibited. Chapter 5. Relationship Development and Maintenance . Relationship Development, Deterioration, and Maintenance study guide by juliamo includes 35 questions covering vocabulary, terms and more. Quizlet.

Specifically, Gottman argues that marital partners' negative message behavior causes a shift in perceptions of each other that lead to unfavorable beliefs about the partner. In particular, negative message behavior e.

Whereas stable couples have a 5: Unstable couples, however, exhibit an equal number of positive and negative messages. According to Gottman, negative conflict behaviors lead to negative emotional reactions. Differences between stable and unstable couples also are evident in the attributions made regarding partners' negative behavior Gottman For example, stable partners rely on positive or benign attributions to explain negative behaviors e.

Unstable partners, on the other hand, explain the causes of their problems using hostile attributions, or explanations that reflect internal, stable, global, and intentional features of the partner e.

Relationship maintenance

Once hostile attributions are in place, partners tend to distance themselves from one another, re-cast the history of the marriage, and, finally, separate. The primary strategies for maintaining stability would be to use cooperative messages, avoid negative reciprocity, and attempt to explain the partner's negative behavior using benign attributions. If one cannot alter defensive beliefs about the partner, then the assistance of a marital counselor, therapist, or spiritual leader would appear to be in order.

Maintaining Quality For many people, simply staying together is not sufficient; instead, the quality of the relationship is important. For researchers, this means examining behaviors that are linked to relational satisfaction and other indicators of quality. Laura Stafford and Daniel J. Canary set out to determine a finite set of behaviors that would lead to increases in relational quality. By quality, Stafford and Canary referred to satisfaction, trust, control mutuality i.

Using various methods, these authors uncovered a finite set of relational maintenance behaviors. Stafford and Canary derived five relational maintenance strategies, or approaches to keeping the relationship in a satisfactory condition.

These strategies are positivity, or being cheerful and upbeat, not criticizing the partner; assurances, such as stressing one's commitment and love; openness, which refers to directly discussing the nature of the relationship; social networks, or attempts to involve friends and family in various activities; and sharing tasks, which refer to doing one's fair share of chores and other work that needs to be done. Stafford and Canary found that positivity was most strongly related to satisfaction while control mutuality and assurances were most powerfully linked to commitment.

These findings suggest that maintenance behaviors have varying functional utility in promoting different indicators of quality. Relevant research has also found that perceptions of equity affect the desire to maintain quality relationships Canary and Stafford Equity refers to whether the distribution of rewards divided by costs is fair. An inequitable relationship occurs when one person is overbenefited i.

Canary and Stafford found that both self-reported maintenance strategies and perceptions of partner use of maintenance strategies were highest when the person felt the relationship was fair. However, people who felt overbenefited or underbenefited were less likely to use and perceive the use of the maintenance strategies indicated previously.

In addition, self-reported inequity combined with perceptions of partners' maintenance strategies to affect important relationship characteristics, such as commitment. That is, maintenance behaviors would positively affect relational quality, but a lack of equity especially underbenefitedness would negatively affect relational quality. Maintaining the Status Quo Once a relationship has reached a particular level e. That is, there should be no changes in the fundamental nature of the relationship.

Accordingly, current levels of intimacy, for example, should remain within a predictable and low level of fluctuation around a set point. Dramatic fluctuation—whether they reflect increases or decreases in intimacy—is not desired. Joe Ayres examined hypothetical reactions of participants who imagined that their partners wanted either to increase or decrease the level of intimacy they had. Ayers derived three maintenance strategies, or approaches to dealing with the situation: When imagining a partner who wanted to escalate intimacy, people reported they would use directness and avoidance.

Relationship Maintenance |

When imagining a partner who wanted to reduce intimacy, participants reported that they would use directness and attempt to balance the situation. Clearly, Ayres provides evidence that people respond to changes in the status quo with particular communication strategies and that these strategies might vary as a function of how the partner wants to change the status quo.

  • Relationship Development and Maintenance in a Mediated World

In an examination of a particular relationship context, Susan J. Canary, and Kimberly Hause investigated how opposite-sex friends maintained their relationships as platonic.

relationship development and maintenance

Messman and her colleagues found that opposite-sex friends used several strategies to sustain the platonic nature of the relationship. These include positivity e. The most commonly used strategies to keep a relationship platonic were alike for men and women: Noting that many researchers have presumed that opposite-sex relationships are ripe with sexual tension, Messman and her colleagues also wanted to link different motives for having a platonic friendship to relational maintenance strategies.

Motives included safeguard relationship, which refers to keeping the positive benefits afforded by the relationship e. The desire to safeguard relationship was the strongest predictor of all the maintenance strategies.

relationship development and maintenance

This finding underscores the power that wanting to keep a relationship in a particular state can have. Repairing Troubled Relationships Occasionally, there is trouble in paradise. The trouble may involve a problem that is acute e. The question of how to repair a relationship that has gone through a severe test—or an ongoing series of tests—has lead various researchers to identify behaviors that function primarily to overcome problems.

In terms of repairing relationships that have experienced acute problems, we turn to research on repairing a transgression.

In discussing the more chronic problems, we turn to research on reactions to problems. Not surprisingly, in romantic relationships the most offensive transgression involves sexual infidelity, followed by behaviors such as other forms of unfaithfulness, lying, physical violence, lack of trust, an unsavory past, and lack of consideration Emmers and Canary ; Metts Although transgressions vary in the extent to which they challenge relational contracts, they all can raise doubts in the mind of the partner who assesses the transgression.

In other words, transgressions lead to uncertainty about the person who has committed the behavior as well as about the relationship itself.

Researchers have uncovered various strategies that people use to repair a relationship following a transgression. These authors found that partners relied on interactive behaviors most to repair their relationships. Kathryn Dindia and Leslie Baxter reported a similar finding—people tend to want to talk about issues when making attempts to repair their relationships. In terms of which behaviors led to actual repair, less obvious results were reported.

Emmers and Canary found that repair measured in terms of retained intimacy was greater when men did not use passive behaviors. But even these close connections are relying on more computer mediated communication today. Texting can have many uses, from coordinating task sharing to simply letting someone know you are thinking about them.

People may use Facebook to plan activities with others, announce new relationships, and provide support and encouragement to those in need. Even the birthday card has migrated online. Although technology cannot replace face-to-face communication in these cases, it can supplement and reinforce the importance of the relationship. Although there may be some face-to-face communication or telephone calls, social media such as Facebook is enough to maintain an acquaintanceship.

Here they can post photos and comments to maintain contact and keep up on each other's lives. If someone is having a bad day, they can provide the necessary support and positivity needed to maintain the relationship. Individuals may meet through a message board or on Facebook while living hundreds of miles away. These virtual relationships require the least amount of maintenance.

relationship development and maintenance

People in a virtual-only relationship may be highly committed to each other and display just as much maintenance behavior as those in close proximity. Idealization often will reflect unreal expectations. Facebook relationship maintenance follows implicit rules for interaction. Even if those in a virtual or long-distance relationship do arrange to meet in person, it is usually set up well in advance and allows time to prepare for control of the encounter to reinforce the online image rather than the reality of their life.

Through the technological advancements that have taken place over the past twenty years, communication has evolved from handwritten letters to emails to text messaging to Facebook to Skype, significantly shortening response times with every step. The increased use and familiarity with technology, even as it evolves, will result in user's adaptation to computer mediated communication and reduce some of the advantages of face-to-face communication.

However, the amount of time spent together improves the satisfaction in any relationship and face-to-face communication is still recommended whenever possible. Both are common behaviors, though they are embodied in different ways and perhaps with different ulterior motives. When you phone somebody to congratulate them on a birthday or anniversary, it is a deliberate action that clearly shows you taking the time to show your affection for someone you have a relationship with.

These are clear strategic behaviors designed to give positive reinforcement. For example, if a wife is cleaning up from dinner, and her husband decides to take out the trash.

Relationship maintenance - Wikipedia

This would be considered a Routine Maintenance Behavior. They are used without the express purposes of maintaining a relationship, yet they still help people preserve their bonds with one another. Part of this has to do with the difference in routine maintenance and an exchange relationship. The key difference being that benefits are given without one expected in return, as in an exchange relationship.

From this perspective the maintenance and enhancement of close relationships depends on the extent that both people are concerned for each other's needs, and are willing and able to meet those needs. In romantic relationships, there is the intimacy element that is added. This is physical intimacy and a deeper emotional intimacy than a friendship would have.

There are four relationship stages when it comes to romantic relationships: It was reported that married and engaged couples used more assurances and task sharing than did dating couples. However, engaged and seriously dating couples reported that they used openness and positivity more than did married couples.

Relationship Maintenance

Then, married couples reported the most social networking. Daters tended to be more social with one another. For example, they called and sent each other notes and cards more than the married couples did. They use maintenance behavior early on in the relationship and then also in the later years of their marriage. As the years progress they may shift focus to family or careers, but then later on when their children have grown and they are settled in their careers the focus may come back to the relationship maintenance since the couple have less distractions.

Strictly platonic groups have both sides saying they do not want anything romantic out of the relationship. Those in mutual romance groups both want the friendship to become romantic. Individuals in a desires-romance group indicate that they wanted the friendship to become romantic, but the partner indicate they want to stay friends. Last, the rejects-romance group said that they would like the friendship to stay platonic, but the other person wanted it to become romantic.

relationship development and maintenance

Friends that want to move to romantic relationships use more maintenance behaviors, as increases in maintenance behavior mark a change from friendship to romance. These groups tend to talk about outside relationships and there is activity done together and less flirtations used.

One of the main challenges in maintaining a long-distance relationship is the lack of face-to-face contact and communication. When couples are able to have face-to-face communication, they are able to do things together, and interact with each other in a physical manner. People in long-distance relationships typically use less maintenance behaviors, such as openness, assurances, and joint activities, than people that are in a geographically close relationship. Compared to couples in geographically close relationships, people in long-distance relationships tend to engage in less joint activities, task sharing, and social networking.

The building up and breaking down of relationships is given in ten stages. Maintenance in Knapp's model accounts for the struggle that exist between the fifth stage, bonding, and the sixth stage, differentiation.

Bonding allows a dyad to demonstrate to society that they are connected, such as through a marriage ceremony. Differentiation allows for individuals in the couple to maintain their personal space, such as through having their own friends, hobbies, or careers. Relationship maintenance exists in the delicate balance between bonding and differentiation.

Should a couple begin to differentiate to a great degree, they will likely begin to fall into relationship dissolution. The stages of a relationship can be compared to an elevator ride and how it goes either up to higher levels of intimacy, or goes down to termination. Different levels can remain the highest stage if we don't find what we are looking for and turn around back to the beginning.

relationship development and maintenance