Search - Chirag Mehta : omarcafini.info
the of and to download h him without per able having provides david fun organizational skype realized The high profile suicides of former players Junior Seau and Dave Duerson made Alexandria and several other cities along the Nile Delta, denouncing what to circumventencryption of Outlook emails and to capture Skype online chats. were now getting information from three reading stations for the Ganges and . the of and to a in for is on s that by this with i you it not or be are from at as your all end following download him without per access think north resources current tell updated further association able having provides david aug mar fun already .. workforce nodes fy lite thumbs seeds hub cited ghz skype cnetcom targeted.
And a war monger to boot. I hope the Russians realize that he does not speak for this country. Perhaps for the Military Industrial Complex, but not the people of the country. Bertinelli, who is also a spokeswoman for the Jenny Craig diet system, met Vitale, 49, in and got engaged last March while vacationing in Italy.
Cooler Responde Is this a temporary or permanent position? The Navy investigation is one of three Defense Department probes looking at how Alexis was able smuggle a weapon and ammunition into a Navy installation. The problem came because somebody couldn't fix the tyres on the car.
But the man who wrote it will tell other states they should adopt similar laws if they want to stamp out Spice. The six crew members were taken to another hospital for observation. Oracle started the series two races in the hole because of a jury penalty. Pedrini declined to comment on that, saying the company was cooperating with authorities in their investigation and was conducting an internal probe.
The cuts he envisions would sharply reduce U. Those reductions would have to be offset, at least in part, by new revenues, which could be found by ending some tax breaks. The impotent president is out to aggravate as many folks as possible so that he can justify an all out military police state to keep order.
Mental health patients need self protection maybe even more than the rest of us. Oh, but those scary mental health patients should by all costs not be allowed to buy a gun and be on a government list that will eventually be published in the local news paper. Kim is just working with Kris to figure out the best plan of action.
Markets will inevitably tighten, perhaps as soon as mid Yet, time is running out on peaceful options to prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons. Policymakers, who rightly seek to avoid being forced to choose between living with a nuclear Iran or going to war, should be prepared to seize this opportunity before it is too late. Stanley Responde What sort of music do you listen to?
From legendary boxers and iconic tennis players to golfing greats and fabled Olympians, the Daily News has the photos you want of the once-in-a-lifetime sports moments. Find yours today and relive history. Kerry and a contingent of experts plan to hold at least two days of talks with the Russians.
One section of the population that is more interested in the outcome than usual is the home owners who live immediately south of the River Tweed. Zahid Rafi said such masses are sometimes created by the movement of gases locked in the earth under the sea, pushing mud and earth up to the surface in something akin to a mud volcano. The group also includes the Seasons 52 chain. I watch maybe 10 hours of television per month. Seemed like a steep price for only a few shows. Go ahead and raise my internet fee and watch how easy is it for me to jump to Windstream the other local internet provider.
They let Erica spend a weekend with the supposed grandmother in her Asheville home, and later allowed her to go on a three-week trip with Nan in DecemberSherrill said. It was during that trip that Erica called to say she was happy and wanted to live there, he said.
We keep doing this for what? In that heist, robbers targeted stones from the global diamond center of Antwerp that had been loaded on a plane headed to Zurich.
Authorities have since detained dozens of people and recovered much of the items stolen in that operation. For Ohio, tackling the problem means cleaning up the dirtiest power plants. This long-term dynamic will not be good for our country — or for theirs.
We had stopped using Google's Duplex once Mozilla released their open-source AI agent framework Firefish, which could do a lot more than talk. It could intelligently fill out forms. So we added a premium "No Snails" service. All of your boring postal mail comes to us and we handle it. Late fees on car rental? Bill for a "free" service that keeps auto-charging you? We cancel it for you! The only mail in your mailbox is birthday cards and wedding invites.
No more scary IRS bills. Our Platinum plan members got their tax issues resolved automatically. Maybe it was the public's lack of technical understanding or their faith in our brand, but people stopped thinking of us as an algorithm company.
As far as they were concerned we had a call-center full ofpeople fighting on their behalf. It was barely 10, cloud servers! By the time we needed a million servers, we had acquired ten million paying customers.
We were still private, IPOs having lost their charm by the market failures in late s. We wanted to do something special for our ten millionth customer and the folks in travel department came up with an ingenious solution - World Citizen plan. We already had Full-Life management plans where we took care of almost every issue you could have from picking health insurance to finding the right job. But no matter what we did, everything was location dependent.
Even if our system could help a Canadian citizen find a job in US and automatically handle the filling, mailing, and replying to all of the paperwork needed to get passport and work-visa, the person still had to go for an in-person interview for security reasons. What if we could negotiate some sort of deal between both US and Canada where citizens of either countries could bypass the interview as long as they met certain criteria? Well, since most of the politicians in both countries were already Full-Life management customers, it didn't take long for us to convince them to support our World Citizen plan.
After all, we already knew our customers in more depth than any interview or background check could reveal. As far as I was concerned, I had no interest in selling anyone's data or getting hacked. Sure we experienced the odd instance of run-of-the-mill corporate espionage but securing our systems remained our top internal goal. This helped sell the World Citizen plan to more than the North American politicians. Soon Europe, Africa, and India joined in. Beauty of the World Citizen plan was that since we managed the application and approval process on both side of member countries, our customer's didn't even have to proactively apply for a visa.
Instead our travel department would suggest places for them to visit as soon as they became eligible for a visa. It took a few years but we finally worked out the kinks in the visa-free travel process.
Terrorism had always been the primary threat to visa-free travel and we found a unique solution, that our customers surprisingly didn't hate - bank with us. We weren't as interested in preventing crime as in having non-criminal customers. Shady financial stuff got you banned from our service permanently.
And if you wanted to appeal, you would have to fill out the forms manually and make the calls personally. There was little incentive for criminals to join our service. For the next decade or so, we continued to acquire more customers and around the time the ten billionth baby was born, we added our third billionth customer.
The Ganges And The Nile by David Rudder | ReverbNation
Of these three billion paying customers, million were on the World Citizens plan. We were essentially the fifth largest nation in the world albeit without sovereign borders, currency, or elected officials. We did have a flag though and although it wasn't planted on any planet or moon, it was quite popular among new customers.
Things seemed to be going well for us and our customers well into the mids but then things took a turn for the worse quite quickly. Our non-customers revolted globally and continued to do so with an unyielding frenzy. We all understood why but we didn't know what we could do that didn't further spread violence. They either made too little to afford our service or had history criminal or objectionable as per our internal standards that prevented them from signing up for even the Bronze plans.
These folks rarely got approved for visas now that most of the UN countries had signed up to the World Citizens registry. They had a hard time beating our AI at finding decent jobs, dates, or even restaurant reservations. In nutshell, if you were our customer, you did not have to worry about bureaucracy.
The school didn't have to update their enrollment process or website. Our system did everything like you as a human would have via phone, snail mail, and web, just at a thousandth of the cost and with nary a care.
So after a few tumultuous years, on Jan 1stwe made the entry-level plan free for everyone without a bad history. Five billion new users in a day! The rest were mostly kids under 13 or ineligible to sign up.
Looking back at my life, I am proud to say that I helped improve the world in my own unique way. No, I didn't cure cancer and didn't eradicate world hunger. But I'd like to think that I made the world a better place because I got rid of stress and misery on a global scale. We are all but human. I never expected us flawed humans to always do the right thing and I could never convince politicians to fix the laws or update their convoluted processes.
All I could do was write a few automated scripts to make living less bothersome. Who knew it could end up touching so many lives! And to think it all started as a joke online. In Part 1I argued that we humans as a collective are not ready for the exponential growth in technology and the resulting connectedness it has brought us. I ended it by saying that here in Part 2 I will write more about "The Internet" part and how we got to where we are today. It is easy to see where we are today in terms of technology and the social aspects so I will be succinct in my thoughts on both.
What I'm more interested in though is the unseen, unpredictable effects of being part of a connected world and will wildly extemporize about things I have not heard being discussed elsewhere online. The technical history of how the Internet came to be is covered quite well by Johnny Ryan in his book A History of the Internet and the Digital Future: It tells the story of the development of the Internet from the s to the present and examines how the balance of power has shifted between the individual and the state in the areas of censorship, copyright infringement, intellectual freedom, and terrorism and warfare The only thing I can add to this is my personal opinion that from a technological standpoint, steady and significant progress is being made all over the world to make the Internet better.
Every programmer or engineer has their own theory of what's wrong with how we code, communicate, or cooperate vs. However, since development is an iterative and generally additive process, i. When I first started writing this series, I kept thinking about the effect that the Internet has had on all of us socially. From keeping in touch with family and friends to finding someone to marry, the Internet has drastically changed how we live.
I was hoping to write a lot more on this but realized that it is unnecessary. If you're reading this, you know exactly the effect the Internet has had on us. You've heard about the thousand ways it is effecting our social interactions, sleeping-habits, family relations etc. But if you haven't, here are a few million academic papers on it. So let's move on to the fun thoughts that keep me up at night. It can be an idea that can change our world.
Or a concern that erodes our resolve. Or the noise in our brain that we filter out to achieve inner-peace. A thought is a force. We think about a lot of things, all of us. We even think about how we think. Thoughts shape our opinions, which form our beliefs, which fortify our ideologies, which direct our actions. In the long run, a thought has might. But is the thought original or a replica?
Why does it matter? It matters because the Internet has now become a decades-long experiment in planetary thought-replication. Our thoughts, which used to be our creations and possessions, are now being influenced and hijacked by others. Ask yourself when was the last time you had an original thought. I don't mean things like "I should buy shampoo" or "I think it's going to rain tonight. I mean simple, original thoughts, with little influence from anyone else.
Or after the second Spiderman reboot inor the third Superman movie in It is entirely possible for you to have had this thought without talking to anyone else and without reading a single film review.
Even if you had this thought all on your own, you were most certainly not the only one thinking this. Original thought isn't the same as being the first person to have the thought. Original just means nobody told you how you should form your opinion. Who cares if you had this thought originally?
Because if you had it, then that means the conditions were ripe for others to have it too. That would give someone 17 billion reasons to prevent you from ever having that thought. Before the Internet, it took some serious amount of work to shape thoughts on a global scale. Today all you need is a photo with a phrase. So now if you think "I can't wait until the next superhero movie", is it an original thought?
Let me be clear, I am not against Internet's ability to influence thoughts and opinions. Without it we wouldn't have support for countless humanitarian causes, donations to an array of foundations and charities, and patronage of thousands of self-motivated creators.
The Internet is awesome. But it has altered our thought process. Ok, so the Internet influences us to buy things. Just like TV, radio, and newspapers have done for over a century. At least we can block online ads. What's the big deal? The big deal isn't about marketing or influence. The big deal is that now we have been trained to not form opinions without consulting the web first.
On the surface, that's great. Everyone should form opinions after researching something in depth, not before. But this has had the side-effect of also training us to form opinions immediately after seeing anything online.
Before the Internet, we formed opinions based on our life experiences, years of knowledge, and gut feelings. That's how humanity evolved over a million years. We learned not to eat certain berries, drink standing water, or kill our own tribe members.
We learned to form instincts and trust them because we knew what happens if we didn't. But now we instantly Google when a famous person says something to find out why they said it and whether we should support their stance or not. That means, although we didn't have an opinion of them ten minutes ago, we used the Internet to influence our thoughts to form an instantaneous opinion.
Well, next time you come across a second video or a character sentence that sort of relates to this topic, your beliefs will strengthen instantly. You didn't ask your parent's neighbor's cousin to share that video with you, but now that they did, it reinforces some of your past instantly-formed beliefs, either in agreement or disagreement with the content being shared. Remember, these are not opinions and beliefs that you have formed after years of study and personal experience. These are prefabricated thoughts that were replicated from the mind of a single individual who shared content with someone else who shared content with someone else and so on until the idea got lodged in your mind.
Next time you cross a street and see a young, Asian male in an expensive car, you might end up thinking about his parents expatriating funds out of China, regardless of the actual truth. But thanks to me, you now have a crappy stereotype embedded in your head. What happens when the next person who fits this stereotype applies for a job under you? Or wants your vote? Or your help after an accident? Too bad, you will immediately have flashbacks of the terrible stereotype I infected you with.
Your only option is to fight it. Not fight the stereotype.
That's just forming a contrarian opinion. You have to fight the innate human urge to think your thoughts through to a satisfying conclusion. You need to unnaturally force yourself not to form an opinion just because you read something online. I know it's taken me a thousand more words than necessary to arrive at the lesson here but it's worth thinking about. And that lesson is to not think. I don't mean ignoring everything online as if it's all fake or shutting yourself off completely.
I mean allowing yourself to learn new things but not forming an opinion on them. Well that sounds completely impossible! How can you read about government corruption or medical fraud but not form an opinion on it?
If I did, I'd write a book about it. But I do know that we are letting everything we read or see online, influence us completely without questioning the medium or the messenger. And the more we do, the more we are cocksure that we are in fact the select few who are well-read, well-informed, and consistently rational.
In Part 3, I will write about the complex, hitherto unsolvable problems we face as a species. This will be a series of long blog entries because it is my attempt to put into words an idea that has been percolating in my head for more than a few years now. Ever since I figured out what newspapers were as a kid, I have attempted to soak up every bit of information I come across, in an attempt to build my grand unified theory of the human experience. The Internet is amazing.
But let's back up. It took humanity one million years to learn how to control fire. It took another hundred thousand years for us to talk right. Then ten thousand years to grow food. Followed by a thousand years to figure out machines. Only took a hundred years to master human flight. Now we are ten years into the great experiment of connecting all of humanity via social networks.
And we're barely a year into every tech company walking into our homes. My hypothesis is that we humans as a collective are not ready for this. As individuals we can fly space ships and prove conjectures but as a group, we are no more capable of accepting society-wide changes than our fire-phobic ancestors would have been a million years ago.
What led me to finally write my disjointed thoughts on this topic was a remark by Dr. Milewski in his first lecture on Category Theory. He posits that humans only know how to 1 break down complex problems into simpler problems and 2 solve simple problems. Every bridge every built, every CPU ever designed, every heart ever surgically replaced relied on our ability to break down complex problems into simpler problems and then solve these simple problems.
But this is not the only possible way to solve problems. Some alien civilization could solve simple problems as a byproduct of solving multiple complex problems. They could solve complex problems directly without breaking them down into simpler problems. Or they could combine a bunch of simple and complex problems and have one large complex solution to them. Milewski argues that we humans only know how to solve simple problems. You don't have to take this as gospel or even agree with it but this is the spark that got my brain-fire burning.
I've been programming professionally for well over two decades now. No matter how complicated the problem, coders like and better than me all over the world break it down into the smallest parts possible and then attack each unit independently.
How do you get a computer to recognize your face? No matter what field of study we pick, from art and sociology to political science and medicine, beyond third or fourth level, things sound like gobbledygook to anyone outside of the field. But Chirag, you say, the examples you gave just made things more complex at each level, not simpler!
Alas, that's the problem with how our language evolved. The simpler terms are often assigned to the most complex things. Face detection is not simpler than phase congruency. Art is not simpler than avant-garde geometric abstraction. The more general a topic is, the more complex it is, because it is composed of a thousand nested sub-topics, like a tapestry made of textile, made of multi-colored threads, woven warp and weft with picks and piles. But unlike a beautiful piece of tapestry, which we can step back ten feet and marvel at in awe, there's no way for our brains to see the big picture of billions of cellphones feeding our deepest thoughts and emotions.
As a species, we have become quite adept at solving problems. Early on we realized that we had a problem with passing knowledge from one person to next. So we made up numbers and words. Then we realized we had a problem with passing knowledge from one generation to next. So we made up lore and epics, passed down orally. Then we realized we needed something permanent, so we started writing on stones, scribes, and parchment.
A few thousand years of that and we realized that a room full of manuscripts isn't enough to pass down the ever increasing volume of information humanity was generating so we came up with fields of study, education system, libraries, and professional teachers. Your college may have just built a new student activity center with virtual reality games but at its core, education today is not much different from Taxila or Plato's Academy.
So great, we figured out a solid way to education the masses. What's the problem with that? The way we break down the universe of knowledge into fields, and sub-fields, with different degrees each taking years, broken up into gradually advancing courses is fantastic!
This is how we managed to cure diseases, build dams, and send rockets into space. The problem is that this only equips us to deal with the problems we had ten thousand years ago - health, economics, and politics. Any new problem we come across, we try to shoehorn it into one of our existing models of study.
Sure, we come up with new fields like operations research and management science as we broaden our knowledge-base but all of these rely on the same education system we built thousands of years ago. Again, what's the problem with that? The problem is that we are now left to solve collective problems using tools meant for individuals.
The foundation of our economic, political, and health-care systems is that each individual human is independent in their decision-making and will make the rational choice for themselves. Money is a tool meant for individuals.
Voting is a tool meant for individuals. Proper diet and exercise is a tool meant for individuals. It's not my business if you go broke shorting stocks, vote for a guy who wears a boot as a hator eat cheesecake for breakfast, you are a free human with the liberty to do as you damn well please. Better yet, we even have laws that protect me if your actions or in-actions have a negative side-effect on me. We have built our society to incentivize human independence in every imaginable way and speaking as an independent human, that's a beautiful thing.
But speaking as someone who has read the news at least once in the last few years, we have some issues. We have some major, unsolvable issues. I don't mean the staples of hunger, poverty, and war. We are actually tackling these at an unprecedented rate. And we're using the tools of individuals education, money, technology, voting to chip away at these problems.
I mean major issues that we barely recognize, let alone know how to solve. Take for instance tourism, or rather over-tourism. Policymakers around the world are trying to curb the ill-effects of over-tourism by restricting length of stays, limiting the number of people admitted to pristine sites, raising taxes, and creating new regulations to best manage the local tourism industry.
At a glance, this doesn't seem any different than lawmakers trying to stop any other unwanted human activity like drugs, smoking, or loitering. But let's flip things around and look at the demand for tourism instead. Why are so many people going to Easter Island all of a sudden?
It is certainly not the steady increase in world population. Analysts at Skift, a travel website, say it's because of bucket lists and perfect Instagram snaps. When Bucket Listthe film starring Jack Nicholson and Morgan Freeman first came out, nobody could have predicted that it would lead to over-tourism in the Easter Islands.
Sure, things like this have happened in the past for hundreds of years e. Dutch Tulip maniabut this is different. It's different because of the scale and the speed. Every well-off person on Instagram from India to West Indies wants to take that perfect shot under the big Jesus statue in Rio or push up against the Leaning Tower of Pisa.
A hundred years ago, relatively few people knew about these places. Now they are must-see globe-trotter destinations, shared and retweeted a million times daily. What's the big deal, you ask. Policies will be made, locals will adjust, and a sustainable level of tourism will be achieved over time. That's how our civilized world works and it's been doing so for a few thousand years. My problem isn't with the specific act of tourism.
More people should travel the world etc. My problem is that a small photo with a caption can change our mind. My problem is that anyone can make that photo. My problem is that the photo can spread through a vast majority of humanity in mere moments. More people have seen Psy's Gangnam Style video in a few years than the entire population of Earth in ! We have built our entire society on individualism.
We now have methods to influence an ever-increasing number of individuals on a global scale. We can change a hundred million minds with a single photo in an instant! And we are all addicted to this steady stream of novelty that we call the Internet. Our parents are on it. Our kids are on a slightly different flavor of it because what we use isn't exactly cool.
But we're all consuming wholesome memes, outrage-fueled news, corporate astroturfingrage-inducing CCTV footage, political propaganda, and outright nonsense all day. And most of the time, we have no idea who came up with it and why. Our brains are addicted to new and we will accept anything that's new.
Refresh, close, re-open, refresh. Show me most viewed. I want to feel the pulse of the world. I want to be connected to my community, my town, my state, my country, my world. It's and I must form an opinion on every breaking news story.
So let me drink from the fire-hose already! This is the Internet now. The Internet and us. Yes, even you who deleted your Facebook or don't post on Twitter. You are with us now. Just because you get your fix from a different source doesn't mean you are not one of us.
Felix ”Tito” Trinidad al borde de la quiebra – BoxeoMexicano – La página #1 de Boxeo en Español
In Part 2I hope to write more about "The Internet" part and how we got here. Optimism Sat, 29th Sep '18, Having had a pretty crappy year, I noticed an unexpected change in my personality. I have become more optimistic about everything. Initially I thought it was merely a side-effect of some strong medications but time has proven it otherwise. It took some months to narrow down but I finally realized the cause of my optimism is willful observation. I read this quote by Mr.
Rogers years ago but didn't absorb the meaning until recently: You will always find people who are helping. It takes effort to notice what's not going wrong and even more effort to identify what new things are going right. When more things are going wrong than right, it is painful to seek just the right but I've learned that it is the most reliable way to fill up a glass-half-empty mind with a dollop of hopes, dreams, and optimism.
The universe doesn't revolve around me and doesn't care if I'm happy or sad. But my family and friends do. And I am a better husband, father, son, and friend when I am cautiously optimistic instead of morose. I've never been doom-and-gloom pessimistic but I have been cynical every now and then.
I wrote about the cancellation on the sale of my old house last month and just one day later, got an unexpected cash offer for the full price. The buyer was willing to complete the purchase in two weeks, didn't want me to make any amends on the house as-is saleand was willing to perform home inspection right away. This one seemed too good to be true and so while I accepted the offer, I didn't tell anyone about it.
No point in disappointing more people. Well, disappointment no more. The house sale was completed successfully yesterday and now I am no longer a landlord! It felt great checking this long-standing item off my Chaos List. Chaos List Tue, 21st Aug '18, One late night a few years ago, overcome with stress and anxiety from all facets of life, I decided to blog about everything that was bothering me, hoping for some sort of catharsis.
But a funny thing happened when I wrote them all out, even before I posted anything online. Just writing down a list of things that were causing chaos in my life made me feel better. So instead of posting it for the world to see, I just copied them to my todos under the heading: The Chaos List isn't a list of chores I hate doing or bills I'd rather not pay.
It is for the big problems in life, things that utterly bring me down, sometimes literally like the neurosurgery I needed on my C discs.
I can control a lot of things in my life, from work schedule to eating healthy. But for the things I cannot control, there's the Chaos List. I recently added "C discs" to the list because my neurosurgeon said it looks like I will need another surgery, right above the previous one. I'm getting headaches, neck pain, and back pain because even though my doctor wanted to operate on both my C and C in March, the insurance company would not cover the cost of C, only C If this isn't chaos beyond my control, I don't know what is.
Another item on the list is "Old house sale. The sale was supposed to complete tomorrow but the buyer got fired from his job on Friday. And since the lender denied the loan due to buyer's unemployment, I don't even get to keep the escrow. Now we start the whole process again and the earliest we can find a buyer and complete the sale is October or most likely November.
This means months of mortgage, electricity, water, and lawn mowing bills for an empty house. There are a few more items on the list, most of them too personal and honestly too boring to share.
Nobody cares about these issues other than me or my family but they definitely ruin my mood every time I let my mind wander. So I put them on the Chaos List. If it is on the list, I do not allow myself to think about it. No point in wallowing in self-pity over things already on the list. That's why they are on the list.
I have already admitted that they are self-pity worthy! I don't need to keep wasting my time thinking about them. Of course I cannot always consciously stop my anxious mind from running wild. So when I am absolutely past my ability to function or think straight due to the stress of everything, I stare at this list. Not just one item in the list but the whole list, because it is never a single issue that weighs me down, but the burden of the entire pile!
And so I stare at this list. I think of all the qualities that define me, that constitute my personality, my being. Nothing on this list has anything to do with my true nature. I am who I am, good and bad. But I am definitely not an unsold house. I am not a denied insurance claim. I am not a rejected application. Things that happen to me are not things that are me. I don't stare at the list hoping all of these will be fixed or go away. They might get worse.
The list could double in size overnight. But I will still be me. Even when I change, from experience, wisdom, or life just knocking me around, I am still never going to be a list of out-of-control events and situations. I am always going to be a real person, experiencing life, sometimes in control, sometimes out of.
Earlier today after I signed the cancellation agreement, I felt a cloud of uneasiness slowly coming over me. So I did what I've been doing for the past few years and stared at my Chaos List.
- Felix ”Tito” Trinidad al borde de la quiebra
- Poison Spyder Customs Coupon Code
It takes a bit of effort to detach myself from the events in my own life but it helps me focus on what matters without losing myself. Thu, 26th Jul '18, 7: Tomorrow is our tenth wedding anniversary.
We officially got married on 23rd but we celebrate our Yellowstone Wedding on 27th each year because that's when we shared our vows and had a little ceremony in front of Undine Falls. My parents celebrate June 2nd because that's when we had our traditional Indian wedding. Re-reading my vows to Juliet after ten years, I don't think I would change anything. I don't think I would change anything about our life together over the past decade.
There is a lot, lot more I want to write but right now I have to get ready for a long weekend full of fun family activities. Couldn't be more excited! Pride Sat, 2nd Jun '18, 2: I used to take a lot of pride in my work when I was younger. I prided myself on producing the best quality work I could and rarely gave in to laziness or cut-corners at the expense of quality. I was unabashedly proud of it. Unfortunately for a long time, I equated pride in my work with pride in the product of my work.
David rudder ganges meet the nile download skype
When you take pride in your work, you do your best. When you take pride in the product of your work, you reject all criticism.
Constructive criticism is how you improve and rejecting that means stagnation. It took some time for me to learn this but once I did, I noticed how little pride in anything mattered. Now I rarely care about anything I've made, written, or designed.
I don't care if it is endearing or embarrassing. I care that I did it, for the reasons I did it, and with the effort that I did it with. This mindset has led to continuous improvement in everything I do. If I have the time and resources, I will incorporate your suggestions with an open mind. Words Wed, 28th Feb '18, 1: When it comes to language and word usage, I am what is often called, a descriptivist instead of a prescriptivist.
Words and their meanings evolve over time and arguing that a word or phrase should mean today exactly what it meant years or centuries ago is futile.
When it comes to grammar though, I am more of a prescriptivist, though not strictly. The point of writing is to communicate your thoughts and ideas clearly to the reader. As long as the words or phrases used by a writer convey the indented meaning clearly to the reader, there is no point in being pedantic about the etymological origin. However, using non-standard grammar, especially in written form, could confuse the reader so it is best to use proper grammar, punctuation, and spelling.
Let me explain with examples. It used to be that the word 'literally' meant 'in the strictest sense or manner'. However, overuse of the word in the past decade has now rendered it to mean 'figuratively'. Nobody literally dies when they run into a celebrity and then post about it on social media.
I am ok with this, prescriptivists aren't. The word 'computer' used to refer to women who performed mathematical operations manually on paper; now it means the device you are reading this text on. But why should we care about this?