SOCIOLINGUISTIC RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN LANGUAGE AND SOCIETY Submitted to fullfil assignment of Mr. Sholihin omarcafini.info By Group I: 1. Rahmat Satria. Get an answer for 'What is the relationships between language and society?I need your help.' and find homework help for other Social Sciences questions at. The study of language and society – sociolinguistics – can be dated to about the informants be random and thus not subject to the possible bias of the field Whereas traditional dialectology focussed on the relationship between language.
All the time language is changing because of social contexts and social contexts cause the language to be changed. However, this does not mean that we should not explore the two other possibilities in some depth, because they can enlighten us about the relationship of language and society.
There are two views here - one is more extreme than the other. The first idea is that language is so powerful that it actually affects how you see the world; the second is that is influences the way we think and behave. A linguist called Whorf claimed language actually affects the way you see the world so language is like a pair of glasses through which we see everything. Whorf said that Hopi and European had different ways of talking about the world, so it influenced the way they saw the world.
European languages treat time as something that can be divided up into separate seconds, minutes and days. Trees and plates can be counted, but water and hope cannot and the language makes distinctions here. The Hopi language treats time as indivisible so that Hopi will not talk about minutes and weeks. Trees and water are simply treated linguistically as non-discrete items.
The result of this claimed Whorf was that the Hopi genuinely see the world differently from Europeans. Their language structure makes them see the world differently. Unfortunately, for this theory, nobody asked the Hopi if they really saw the world differently. It would seem that they see it just as we do. Would their world view shift depending on the language they were speaking? Another example of this theory is the often-cited fact that Eskimos have lots of different words for snow, so it means they actually see different kinds of snow, whereas we only see "snow".
But this isn't really true because we can use words to describe the snow if we need to, e. We aren't tuned to thinking about it that way, but if it becomes important, we can easily do so.
We might not know the names of different makes of car, but still be able to tell the difference between a Fiat and a Rolls Royce, for all that. So could an Eskimo, even if the Inuit language didn't have the exact words. Besides which, Eskimos don't really have all those words for snow - it's just one of those pieces of information that everyone repeats and no-one has checked if it's true.
If you check, you find it isn't true! There is an important lesson here that linguists can learn: Any Hopi or Inuit could have told us immediately that this was a load of nonsense, but no-one ever thought to ask them. Many people, including linguists have done the same when describing sign languages, too.
Often they have said things that people have come to believe when deaf signers have known it wasn't true. The point about the story is that this sort of control does not really work, and cannot work because if we do not have words for our thoughts, we just create them anyway. Still, some politicians and businesses do like to believe that the language we use will affect the way we think about something.
So, language doesn't affect what we can see in the world, but it is still possible that language affects people and society because maybe language still affects the way we can think. Some people say that sign languages don't have abstract signs because all signs are iconic and so deaf people can't think about abstract things like love, bravery, inflation, investment for the future etc.
IF this was true, then we could say this was an example of language affecting people. BSL can express anything that English can. A linguist called Basil Bernstein found that middle class children used an "elaborated" code of English in school.
This meant they used more abstract words, less context dependent words and more complicated sentences. Working class children seemed to use a more "restricted" code. This meant using more concrete words, more context-dependent and less complicated sentences.
So some people but NOT Bernstein said this means working class children can't think in abstract ways because their language doesn't allow them to. This, of course, is nonsense. Just as with deaf people. All it means is that the children used different ways of expressing the same thing. One example of the way that language is said to affect society is in sexist language. The theory is that language affects the way we view men and women because it treats men and women differently.
Relation between language and society | Satria Rahmat - omarcafini.info
If you use words like chairman or fireman it implies only men can do the jobs, so women feel left out. It is worth noting, though, that the form of the words can influence our view of things.
Another feature of English that might exclude women is the use of "him" to mean "him and her". This way the language may create sexism in a society. But really, it's more likely that the society made the language sexist, eg using words to put women down like chick, bird etc. Bird used to refer to men and women, but now it is just derogatory to women.
BSL does not have gender pronouns to correspond to he and she, but does this make the deaf community any more or less sexist? It is possible that signers look at the world differently from speakers, because sign languages are visual and spatial.
If you think in a language that concentrates on order and space, then you are more likely to look at the world like that. One of the biggest blocks to hearing people learning signed languages rather than signed versions of spoken languages is learning to think about the world so that it is spatially organised. Note, though, that hearing people are fully capable of seeing the world spatially - it's just that they aren't used to building space into their language. We have seen, then, that to some extent, language can have an effect on the way we think.
We need to consider the attitude that some people have towards their own language, and attitudes that other people have. The language that we use can make a big difference to the way that we see ourselves, and the way society sees us. It can also influence the way we relate to society.
Find out which adverts on television have regional accents of English, and which have "middle-class accents. What products are they advertising? Can you spot any pattern? Accent is very important in Britain. Advertisers on television only use regional accents for voice-overs if the product is cheap or if the aim is to amuse. Serious things or expensive products use the voices of middle-class men. During the war, the BBC had to use "middle class" speakers the read the news because no one believed the people with regional accents.
This has now changed, which goes to show that social factors in languages do vary and change over time. However, not all regional accents have the same social acceptability and "broad" that is, strong regional accents are still cannot be too strong for some media broadcasts. Everyone seems to have an idea what is a "good" language or variety and what is a "bad" one. This opinion is entirely socially conditioned.
Sometimes people with power e. Hum By Group I: Of course all statement of content this paper has advantages and disadvantages, so that we hope comment and suggestion from reader for perfection content of this paper and as pilot for us, until we can arranging the paper is perfectly in the future. So that the human used language for talk and interact. Language is sound sign system is arbitrer was used for work same, interact, and self identification. Sociolinguistic is linguistic branch was examine relationship between language and society.
Generally sociolinguistic has discussed about relationship between language and language narrator as community. This paper using theory about relationship between language and society. The research has search relationship between language and society through internet acces and some books. There are 3 factors in sociolinguistic, they are social factor, social dimension, and explanation factor.
Background of the study …………………………… Statements of problem …………………………………. Background of the study We are knew that language and society is unseparable two currency side. No people without country and no country without people. However while the time is running in a language can happened displacement. The matter was happened caused influenced by everything as follow science and technology developments. So like we knew that function of language in general as social communicative.
Language is a vehicle to interact with other people. Thus every people of course should own and use the social means of communication. There are no people without country and no country without people. While the science and technology is running, so language experience transition is very significant.
Language really could not apart from every people. This two case mutual interrelated, so did with indonesian language raised from melayu language was charachteristic lingua franca.
Sociolinguistics is study the relationship between language and society Holmes, The sociolinguistics deals with explaining why we speak differently in different social context and factor such as, class, ethnicity, age, and sex. This study is concerned with the identifying the social functions of language and the ways it is used to convey social meaning.
Sociolinguistics is also the study about dialects, languages in contact, language and education, and language in use Fromkin, In vice versa, Wardhough states that sociolinguistics and the sociology are different study.
Language and social interaction have a reciprocal relationship: Language is a tool for interact with other human.
Through language we can related and interact with other human and created communicative in the community Sociolinguistics is the study of the connection between language and society and the way people use language in different social situations. It asks the question, "How does language affect the social nature of human beings, and how does social interaction shape language? The basic premise of sociolinguistics is that language is variable and ever- changing. As a result, language is not uniform or constant.
Rather, it is varied and inconsistent for both the individual user and within and among groups of speakers who use the same language. People adjust the way they talk to their social situation.
An individual, for instance, will speak differently to a child than he or she will to their college professor. One way that sociolinguists study language is through dated written records. They examine both hand-written and printed documents to identify how language and society have interacted in the past. This is often referred to as historical sociolinguistics: For example, historical sociolinguists have studied the use and frequency of the pronoun thou in dated documents and found that its replacement with the word you is correlated with changes in class structure in 16th and 17th century England.
Sociolinguists also commonly study dialect, which is the regional, social, or ethnic variation of a language. For example, the primary language in the United States is English. People who live in the South, however, often vary in the way they speak and the words they use compared to people who live in the Northwest, even though it is all the same language.
There are different dialects of English, depending on what region of the country you are in. Sociolinguists study many other issues as well. For instance, they often examine the values that hearers place on variations in language, the regulation of linguistic behavior, language standardization, and educational and governmental policies concerning language. But the language function is not merely a means of communication.