Relationship between god and man bible study

Relationships between God and people in the Bible, part III: When the other is an outsider.

relationship between god and man bible study

This lesson is a step beyond, showing you how to really know God by developing that the man of God may be complete, thoroughly equipped for every good work. . human to have an intimate and ongoing relationship with the divine God ?. In an attempt to explain his relationship with God, man often relies on religion to We were bought with a special price—“the precious blood of Jesus Christ” (1 Peter ). that we deserve, was buried, and rose from the dead according to the Bible. God · Jesus Christ · Christianity · Biblical Studies · Popular Issues · Life. This study considers intergroup attitudes in the Bible and compares relationships between God or Jesus and (a) Torah non-Israelites; (b) New Testament people.

One of the purposes for which Jesus the Christ came was to reveal the Father to His disciples.

  • Living Stream Ministry
  • Relationship With God

The family aspect of God God is all about family. He designed the physical to mirror the spiritual. He wants to bring many children to glory. The apostle John confirmed in very clear language why God created mankind.

This understanding was a driving force for those he taught to maintain a proper relationship with God. Therefore the world does not know us, because it did not know Him. What kind of relationship does God want? The verses quoted above show God to be a Father. He is our Father and we are to be His children, following the example set by Christ, our elder brother. The successful relationship model God created is all too often the exception. Too few are actually experiencing this wonderful relationship.

The model for right relationships If you have been blessed by having a loving father and mother who set an example of love and respect for each other and who love their children unconditionally, you will already have a good idea of the type of relationship God wants with you.

The opposite extreme is equally devastating. In this case, the deity of Christ is affirmed, but His humanity is minimized or rejected. Interestingly, the results of this extreme are essentially the same as those of the first extreme. The Bible would not be the Word of God, and salvation would not be available for men. Since the Bible makes it clear that Jesus Christ was completely human, a rejection of His humanity is tantamount to a rejection of the Bible. And salvation would not be available because the substitutionary atonement requires that Jesus Christ must die as a man to bear judgment for the sins of all men.

The Messiah could not have become the mediator between God and man apart from becoming the God-man by taking on human flesh. Errors through the Centuries Church history affords a number of illustrations of how people have tried either to reject or rationalize this God-man mystery.

The Gnostics were among the first who perverted the Biblical doctrine of the God-man. Because of their dualistic conviction that matter is evil, they refused to believe in the incarnation of Jesus Christ. Theirs was a form of Docetism, a doctrine that taught Christ only seemed to have a real body. They believed that Christ tricked the evil god of the Old Testament at the Crucifixion because His body was not real.

Arius said that Christ was different from God and was of another substance. The conflict that arose from this led to the important Council of Nicea in A. Opposition to the deity of Christ was soon followed by a return to the other extreme.

relationship between god and man bible study

Apollinaris held a docetic view of Christ, saying that Christ was not truly human. Apollinaris placed his reason above Scripture and refused to accept that both the human and the divine nature were in Christ.

Nestorius was another church leader who stumbled over this mystery. He ended up with two persons, saying that Jesus as a man was energized by the logos of God. This was effectively a denial of the complete deity of Jesus Christ. Following this, there arose the Monophysite group, who stressed the divine nature in Christ and minimized His human nature to such an extent that His humanity was divested of all but a few human characteristics.

That represented another swing back of the docetic not completely human view of Christ. Though representatives of both extremes regarding the God-man continued to persist, the major christological controversies beginning with the seventh century centered more on the work than on the person of Jesus Christ.

The next major group to deny the deity of Christ in favor of His humanity were the Socinians in the sixteenth century. Since that time the most common trend in avoiding the God-man mystery has been a simple rejection of the biblical testimony concerning the deity of Christ.

This has been supported in large measure by eighteenth- and nineteenth-century philosophy, the evolutionary hypothesis, and higher criticism.

Relationships between God and people in the Bible, part III: When the other is an outsider.

The docetic extreme of minimizing the true humanity of Christ was more common in the days of the early church and is not often found today. Several of these religions regard Christ as simply another prophet sent by God to help enlighten the people of His day. Another popular approach, which has been supported by various esoteric and occult teachings, is the separation of Jesus from Christ.

This is an old idea that goes back to second- and third-century Monarchianism. Thus it is imperative for each true believer in Christ to accept by faith all the scriptural data.

He must not rationalize or disregard those elements that tax his comprehension, or he will be guilty of subjectively choosing those parts of the Bible he likes and eliminating the rest.

Relationship with God

Some Related Issues At his point, it may be helpful to deal specifically with some of the practical problems and questions related to the God-man antinomy. Remember, since these problems are related directly to a true mystery, by definition there can be no really satisfying solutions to them on a human level.

They only illustrate the nature and implications of the mystery of the God-man. One related issue is the preexistence and eternality of Christ prior to His incarnation.

The God-Man |

Many Old and New Testament passages make it clear that Christ existed before He was born of Mary and that there never was a time when Christ was not Micah 5: Christ has always existed without a body apart from time and space as equal with the Father and with the Holy Spirit.

He was always the Son of God by eternal generation from the Father footnote 1. Yet, while He is the same One who has forever existed, in another way He is different. Before He became man He always possessed a divine nature, but since that time He now possesses a divine-human nature the word nature referring to essential qualities or intrinsic properties. He still subsists as the same Person but He is now a divine-human Person.

This concept, that there is now a God-man in heaven and that Christ now has a divine-human nature, affects the Trinitarian relationship because Christ is part of the Godhead. There is a close relationship between the two mysteries of the God-man and the Trinity. He has not changed in His essence or in His subsistence mode of being. This timeless plan provided that Christ would have a divine-human nature while remaining a single personality see John 1: Part of the problem here is the question of what controlled the interaction of these two percent entities.

The real affiliation between the human and the divine in the person of Jesus Christ is an unsolvable mystery, since no one has the intellectual capacities to relate to such a combination.

For Kierkegaard, the absolute paradox is a scandal to reason because it simultaneously unites the nonhistorical with the historical in the person of the God-man. Because of this, Kierkegaard believed that faith and reason cannot be harmonized. Most Christian scholars part company with him on this point. The Problem of the Kenosis The great passage that describes the kenosis self-emptying of Jesus Christ is Philippians 2: In studying chronology we can discover things we ordinarily would not discover.

For example, when we study the history of the patriarchs, we find that Adam was still alive at the time Enoch was walking on the earth. Adam had seen God, but Enoch had never seen God.


We may think that the one who had seen God should have been raptured. But in the end Enoch was raptured; Adam was not raptured. This is a lesson to us. This also shows the accuracy of the Bible. Paul tells us in Galatians 3 that grace preceded the law; it did not come after the law. We have to know the chronology, and then we will see that the grace of promise was in existence years before the coming of the law. It is easy to find biblical chronology from the book of Genesis.

After Genesis it is more difficult to dig out the chronology. And afterward…God gave them Saul…for forty years. And when He had deposed him, He raised up David for them as king.

relationship between god and man bible study

Hence the record of 1 Kings has ninety-three fewer years than the record of Acts