Heavy Meddle: How Important Is Intellectual Compatibility In A Relationship? | Cognoscenti
Intellectual compatabilty is crucial for a long, rewarding relationship, . intellectually incompatible, does that mean your relationship won't work. Can a relationship work between a hyper-intellectual and a simpler, more .. No, I don't go to the dumb action movies with him - but I do go to other .. Now, of course, a selfish and mean intellectual is no good at all, but I'm. In definition two the focus is on the connection between what happens first and what happens second because intellectual attraction is the lead.
In this case the stuff is have mental interaction.
How important is intellectual compatability in a relationship? : AskReddit
This assumption sets off lots of red flags in my head. Sure, they probably are for some people, but assuming they are or should be all the time causes all sorts of problems for people who experience one without the other.
For Acetheist, desire is an intent or interest. You can have both, none, or just one. A definition of intellectual attraction that assumes intellectual desire is problematic because it erases some experiences while prioritizing others. If you experience intellectual attraction without intellectual desire, or intellectual desire without intellectual attraction, you are rendered incomprehensible. That being said, I retain definition one because people continue to use or imply definitions of intellectual attraction that fit into it and this post is about how the term is being mobilized.
I write probably because the focus is not really on intellectual attraction. In definition two the focus is on the connection between what happens first and what happens second because intellectual attraction is the lead up to another form of attraction.
The second form of attraction varies. This is where sapioromantic and sapiosexual come in — these labels indicate that intellectual attraction turns into romantic and sexual attraction respectively. For ghostwriterthe second form of attraction is platonic because you want to be their best friend. Another major difference between definition one and definition two is the aim — what do you want to do? In definition one mentally interacting with the object of your attraction is satisfying.
For example, if the second attraction is platonic, the attraction would be satisfied by being friends. This is clear in quotation one where Ithaca refers to experiencing romantic attraction to people whose brain you like. As in definition two, the end aim goal is not mental interaction.
This option reflects an understanding that forms of attraction do not automatically synch up. For example, a person could be heterosexual panromantic. Gender might not matter to them for romance, but it is restricted for a sexual relationship.
As such, they may hyphenate their romantic orientation to say, homo-sapioromantic or bi-sapioromantic. They could be hideous. House, Artemis Fowl, Sheldon Cooper. I would sleep with any of those people in a heartbeat just because they are smart. If you met someone that was attractive to you in another way, you could still be attracted to them. The truth is a little harder to face.
What is Intellectual Intimacy, and Does it Actually Exist?
Most Harvard students are at that school not because they have big brains, but because they have immense drive. Generally speaking, they lack access to opportunity — and to a familial culture and community that stresses education and achievement.
In the end, every love story is about bridging a divide. Politicians and pundits, particularly conservative ones, have made a lot of money exploiting this dynamic.
It would be nice to suppose that true love conquers all. Which means you have to want to know that person, and you have to believe that person has depths worth exploring. Or that he can develop those depths. As to what form those depths will take — that depends entirely on your own needs. I know plenty of happy couples in which one member is more ambitious, and more preoccupied with the world of ideas.
As a rule, this member tends to find intellectual companionship among their colleagues and friends. They turn to their partners for other things, such as emotional and psychological support. These couples tend to complement each other. And you have to be honest with yourself about these feelings, even if they make you feel guilty. First, whether you need this guy to be ambitious in the way you are in order to respect him.
Are there ways in which his approach to life might actually teach you something crucial, such as how to relax? Second, whether you feel his love for you might induce him to want to be more ambitious and intellectually curious. Just as you should be willing to work.
Tell him about your concerns. Be as honest, and sensitive, as you can.